steelasebo.blogg.se - Scrabble word checker

Scrabble word checker update#
Scrabble word checker full#
Scrabble word checker code#
Scrabble word checker Offline#

The app does what it claims but leaves a lot of roughness around the edges:ġ. The default one is Collins Scrabble 5th edition.

Original Answer : Hi, to select the dictionnary to use, please go in « settings » and select the one you want.

Scrabble word checker update#

Update 4 january : thanks for suggestions, a new version would be available in january, i would try to integrate your request -) Update 10 january : we update the dictionnary list, it's more visual now :) About the cursor when Checker tab is selected, i didn't find yet a good solution, but i'm on it. Why would I want to use a word list that is not used in the US?. Both lists appear to be used to determine if a word is allowed. What list is used to determine if a word is allowed? The description says it includes Collins (UK & international) and Tournament (US, Canada, Israel, Thailand)? There doesn’t appear to be differentiation in determining if a word is allowed. Other suggestions: Can the cursor automatically move to typing area and keyboard pop-up once “Checker” tab is selected? If not then typing area lower on screen. Maybe it should say “Word List Selected”. If you like the app, please rate it and leave comment on the App Store. "Word Checker" is not affiliate with the registered brand Scrabble®

Comprehensive definitions provided by The American Heritage Dictionary, Wiktionary, Century Dictionary, Collins Dictionary and more. No internet require (use local dictionary files)

NASPA Word List dictionnary (NWL) USA, Canada and Thailand.

Scrabble word checker full#

The dictionary lists all the accepted words (feminine, plural, orthographic variants and all conjugated forms)Įasy to use, the app provide also the full definition of words and it works offline.

Scrabble word checker Offline#

Work offline with full definition (Naspa Official dictionary 2020 & CSW19 included)įor amateurs and professionals, this application includes the complete list of words authorized by the official game of Scrabble®. """Create the variable containing the master list of words."Word Checker" is a simple and accurate word judge for scrabble and other word games. Similarly, your function definition def look_up(): for x in word] is so called list comprehension - it creates the list of scores for every x in word - and then the function sum() will add its items together. May be as simple as def calc_score(word): """Calculate the score of a given word.""" Your function definition def calc_score(word):

Printing output restricts a function to a printing context.

Getting user input in a function restricts it to a user context.

look_up, dict_maker, and list_print are pretty vauge function names.

if valid reads better than if valid = True.

These changes come at little to no cost while also vastly improving the code's cohesion, so why not? the score each letter gets, which file the words are stored in, whether you get the rack from a user or an AI). If you refactor these to function parameters, you can programatically change and reuse them (i.e.

You're using a fair amount of hard coded constants and globals.

Scrabble word checker code#

Use a main function so you can import the code in this file: if _name_ = "_main_":ĭict = dict_maker(scores, word_master, rack) Note how this also simplifies the logic too since a function return acts more naturally than a break. I'd argue this helps with code readability since the function name documents what the inner for loop is doing while also allowing for code reuse. You could break out some of the code in rack_check into a seperate function perhaps called can_be_spelled. Since it kind of acts like a main function, this is somewhat excusable however, it's doing its own job (printing the tuples) while also having to call dict_maker. It would be much better to pass that user input as a parameter.Īnother function that does too much is list_print. For example dict_maker gets input from the user (not specified in docstring). Several of your functions are doing too much work. Furthermore, you can even replace for item in word_master: with for item in look_up()

word_master = look_up() should be contained in rank_check function.

This is fairly uncommon practice, as it shadows a builtin.

In list_print you assigned a dictionary using dict as its name.

I'm a little short on time to look over the logic, so I will finish the rest later, but here's some quick observations. The task was to create something that would provide a list of the best possible words to play given a set of letters on your rack. This is a project I saw online that I tried to tackle today.

I'm very new to coding and am trying to work through projects for practical review of what I know, but I would like to be able to simplify/improve what I've made.